ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
ICD-10 code validation for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulation: nationwide cohort study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upper Versus Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Hospitalizations: A National Analysis, 2016-2022.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with gabapentin versus duloxetine in older adults with neuropathic pain: a target trial emulation cohort study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Exploring Risks of Adverse Drug Events From Single Drug to Three-Drug Combination.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Validity of ICD-10 codes for identifying gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients: an encounter-level diagnostic accuracy study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in advanced melanoma: a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing first-line immunotherapy and targeted therapy.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation During Anticoagulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundICD-10 codes are commonly used to identify gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) events in observational studies. However, most studies have neither used validated ICD-10 coding algorithms to identify GIB events nor manually confirmed the diagnosis of GIB, which raises concerns regarding the validity of their results. The aim of the study was to estimate the accuracy of ICD-10 codes for GIB in patients receiving oral anticoagulation and to develop new coding algorithm for identifying GIB events.
methodsUsing a national prescription database, all patients receiving oral anticoagulation in Iceland from 2014 to 2019 were identified. GIB events were identified using thorough search of ICD-10 codes from all five major hospitals in Iceland. To augment the code search, endoscopy results and death cause in the national death registry were reviewed. All diagnoses were manually confirmed via chart review and used as gold standard. The PPV was calculated for individual codes, and codes with PPV ≥ 75% were included in the ICD-10 coding algorithm.
resultsThe ICD-10 coding algorithm had 61.3% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 90.0% PPV, and 98.0% negative predictive value. GIB events identified using this ICD-10 coding algorithm were more commonly major bleeding events, and more commonly required hospitalization, anticoagulation reversal, anticoagulation discontinuation, and endoscopic intervention compared to GIB events that were missed.
conclusionsThe ICD-10 coding algorithm reported here had good accuracy in identifying true GIB events and the events that it identified were clinically more severe than those that it missed. The sensitivity of the ICD-10 coding algorithm was modest and can be improved by reviewing endoscopic results and death registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.