Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063011›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

ICD-10 code validation for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulation: nationwide cohort study.

Arnar Bragi Ingason, Jóhann Páll Hreinsson, Arnar Snær Ágústsson, Sigrún Helga Lund, Edward Rumba, Sigríður Kristjánsdóttir, Einar Stefán Björnsson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arnar Bragi IngasonDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States. arnarbingason@gmail.com.
Jóhann Páll HreinssonDepartment of Medicine, Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Arnar Snær ÁgústssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sigrún Helga LundFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Edward RumbaFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sigríður KristjánsdóttirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Einar Stefán BjörnssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Funding

Icelandic Centre for Research 207113-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundICD-10 codes are commonly used to identify gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) events in observational studies. However, most studies have neither used validated ICD-10 coding algorithms to identify GIB events nor manually confirmed the diagnosis of GIB, which raises concerns regarding the validity of their results. The aim of the study was to estimate the accuracy of ICD-10 codes for GIB in patients receiving oral anticoagulation and to develop new coding algorithm for identifying GIB events.

methodsUsing a national prescription database, all patients receiving oral anticoagulation in Iceland from 2014 to 2019 were identified. GIB events were identified using thorough search of ICD-10 codes from all five major hospitals in Iceland. To augment the code search, endoscopy results and death cause in the national death registry were reviewed. All diagnoses were manually confirmed via chart review and used as gold standard. The PPV was calculated for individual codes, and codes with PPV ≥ 75% were included in the ICD-10 coding algorithm.

resultsThe ICD-10 coding algorithm had 61.3% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 90.0% PPV, and 98.0% negative predictive value. GIB events identified using this ICD-10 coding algorithm were more commonly major bleeding events, and more commonly required hospitalization, anticoagulation reversal, anticoagulation discontinuation, and endoscopic intervention compared to GIB events that were missed.

conclusionsThe ICD-10 coding algorithm reported here had good accuracy in identifying true GIB events and the events that it identified were clinically more severe than those that it missed. The sensitivity of the ICD-10 coding algorithm was modest and can be improved by reviewing endoscopic results and death registries.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsClinical CodingGastrointestinal HemorrhageInternational Classification of DiseasesAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIcelandMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAnticoagulantsCoding algorithmGastrointestinal bleedingICD-10 codeOral anticoagulantValidation study

Identifiers

PMID41063011
PMCPMC12505704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.