Trial reportBMC psychiatry2025
Effects of different forms of single moderate-intensity exercise on inhibitory function and instant emotion of undergraduate students with depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial based on ERP.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural correlates of response inhibition following cognitive behavioral therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled EEG study.BMC psychology · 2026Trial
- Bidirectional regulatory effects of exercise on emotional eating in depression: an ERP-based narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigated the effects of a single bout of moderate-intensity exercise on inhibitory control and transient mood states in college students with depressive symptoms.
methodsSeventy-five participants with depressive symptoms were randomized into three groups: treadmill exercise, taekwondo exercise (both at moderate intensity), and a non-intervention control group. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included immediate mood states, behavioral performance (reaction time and accuracy) on Go/No-go and Stroop tasks, and concurrent event-related potentials (ERPs). Repeated-measures ANOVA and Pearson correlation analyses were employed to examine exercise-induced changes in inhibitory control and mood.
resultsPost-exercise, both exercise groups exhibited significant improvements in No-go accuracy (treadmill: +10.6%, taekwondo: +20.0%, P < 0.05), though reaction times remained unchanged (P > 0.05). The taekwondo group demonstrated superior Stroop performance, with increased accuracy in congruent (+ 2.9%, P = 0.007, 95% CI [0.698, 4.161]) and incongruent trials (+ 2.7%) and reduced reaction times (congruent: −0.114 s, incongruent: −0.141 s, P = 0.002, 95% CI [− 0.091, − 0.022]), outperforming the treadmill group in reaction time (P < 0.001, 95% CI [− 0.097, − 0.028]). ERP analysis revealed enhanced N2/P3 amplitudes and shortened latencies in exercise groups (P < 0.05), with taekwondo showing broader cortical activation. Immediate mood scores were significantly lower in exercise groups versus controls (F = 5.525, P = 0.006), correlating inversely with inhibitory accuracy (r = − 0.432, P < 0.001) and positively with conflict inhibition reaction time (r = 0.245, P = 0.048).
conclusionA single bout of moderate-intensity exercise confers acute benefits for inhibitory control and mood regulation in depressive individuals. Taekwondo demonstrates greater efficacy than treadmill exercise in enhancing cognitive performance and emotional states, suggesting exercise modality-specific neurobehavioral effects. Improved inhibitory function may mediate mood amelioration, highlighting exercise as a viable adjunct intervention for depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.