Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062931›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Temporal dynamics and optimal dose effects of biochar on soil properties, cotton growth, and bacterial community assembly in saline-alkali soils.

Yuting Wang, Guangli Tian, Qingqing Zhao, Dongwei Li, Shuai He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuting WangInstitute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 380 Hongli Avenue East, Xinxiang, Henan, 453002, P.R. China.
Guangli TianDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry, Jurong, 212400, China.
Qingqing ZhaoInstitute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 380 Hongli Avenue East, Xinxiang, Henan, 453002, P.R. China.
Dongwei LiInstitute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 380 Hongli Avenue East, Xinxiang, Henan, 453002, P.R. China. lidongwei@caas.cn.
Shuai HeInstitute of Farmland Water Conservancy and Soil-fertilizer, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832000, P.R. China. xjshzhs@163.com.

Funding

the Key Technological Research and Development Initiative for Priority Areas in Divisions and Cities of XPCC No. KY2024GG09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar is widely recognized as an effective soil amendment, yet its residual effects on saline soils remain underexplored. This study investigates the residual impact of a single biochar application on soil properties, bacterial community assembly, and cotton growth over three years. A controlled pot experiment was conducted using four biochar treatments − 0%, 1%, 3%, and 5% (w/w) - along with two cotton varieties: salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant. Results showed that biochar reduced soil salinity by 0.80–1.39 g·kg−1 in the second year, with no effects observed in years 1 and 3. By the third year, biochar at 5% increased soil pH by 0.34–0.44 units. Biochar application enhanced soil organic carbon by 135.15%–763.19%, total nitrogen by 12.88%–241.92%, and available potassium by 22.00%–168.84%, in a dose-dependent manner. However, available phosphorus was unaffected by biochar and showed a gradual decline over time. Biochar altered bacterial community composition but had limited impact on alpha diversity. A shift from homogeneous to heterogeneous selection in bacterial community assembly was observed in the third year, correlating with soil nutrient changes. Cotton growth exhibited an “A-shaped” response, with Limited benefits in the first and third years but improvement in the second year. The 1% biochar promoted cotton growth by at least 12.07%, whereas higher concentrations (3% and 5%) had no effect, emphasizing an optimal dose effect. These findings highlight biochar’s potential as a tool for improving saline soils, while underscoring the importance of optimizing application rates and considering its long-term residual effects.

Indexed as

BacteriaCharcoalGossypiumSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbonNitrogenSalinitybiocharCarbonCharcoalNitrogenSoilBacterial communityBiocharCottonProlonged effectsSaline soil

Identifiers

PMID41062931
PMCPMC12505634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.