Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062928›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Creating and sustaining enabling systems and communities to address social needs: protocol for a living lab social prescribing study.

Candice Oster, Ashleigh Powell, Claire Hutchinson, Sahar Faghidno, Svetlana Bogomolova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Candice OsterCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. candice.oster@flinders.edu.au.
Ashleigh PowellCentre for Social Impact, College of Business, Government & Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Claire HutchinsonCentre for Social Impact, College of Business, Government & Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sahar FaghidnoCentre for Social Impact, College of Business, Government & Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Svetlana BogomolovaCentre for Social Impact, College of Business, Government & Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP240100242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial needs - such as housing, income, food security, and social connectedness - have a significant effect on health and wellbeing. One way to address social needs is through social prescribing, which involves screening for unmet needs (e.g., during healthcare appointments) and providing referrals to social and community services. For social prescribing to be effective, it must address both individual needs as well as support the social and community services that are required to meet these needs. The objective of this study is to adopt a place-based framework that combines: (1) individual-level referral for social needs, with (2) community and stakeholder engagement to determine community assets, resources, networks, and need to inform model development.

methodsThe study will be conducted in three-phases across two low-socioeconomic Australian communities, underpinned by the 'enabling places' theoretical framework. Phase 1 will involve identifying key elements that enable place-based social prescribing using photovoice methods with health and social care providers and community members. Outcomes will inform co-design workshops to develop a place-based social prescribing model of care that is augmented by technology to facilitate integration across health, social, and community services. In Phase 2, the co-designed model will be implemented in the two communities. Phase 3 will involve a mixed methods approach to the evaluation of the model's implementation, effectiveness, and social return on investment. DISCUSSION: The study aims to foster place-based initiatives and community development, a missing element in much of the social prescribing discourse. It is anticipated that outcomes will contribute to the design and implementation of social prescribing models that are tailor-made for Australian communities, systems, and funding systems.

Indexed as

Social SupportSocial WorkAustraliaHumansResearch DesignSocial PrescribingCommunity referralLiving labParticipatory researchSocial determinants of healthSocial prescribingSocial return on investmentSocial support

Identifiers

PMID41062928
PMCPMC12505620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.