Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062870›Full record

ArticleBiologia futura2025

Evaluating model-agnostic post-hoc methods in explainable artificial intelligence: augmenting species distribution models.

Don Enrico Buebos-Esteve, Nikki Heherson A Dagamac

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biologia futura, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Don Enrico Buebos-EsteveInitiatives for Conservation, Landscape Ecology, Bioprospecting, and Biomodeling (ICOLABB), Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, España, 1008, Manila, Philippines.
Nikki Heherson A DagamacInitiatives for Conservation, Landscape Ecology, Bioprospecting, and Biomodeling (ICOLABB), Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, España, 1008, Manila, Philippines. nhadagamac@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5155-5415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) remotely guide conservation programs for endangered species by estimating potential reserve areas based on a set of environmental features. Most SDM research only explains their predictions across the study area (global), effectively disregarding the predictions for specific sites (local) where conservation-related activities are confined. This study aims to address this spatial gap in explainability by applying model-agnostic post-hoc methods in explainable artificial intelligence for SDM at two scopes. These methods explain the importance, effects, and interactions of bioclimatic features on the SDM for Mindoro warty pigs (Sus oliveri), an emblematic yet endangered endemic fauna in Mindoro Island, Philippines. Areas with a high predicted probability of presence coincide with higher elevation, spanning the Mindoro Mountain Range. Global explainability methods-Permutation Feature Importance, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), and Accumulated Local Effect-reveal that annual precipitation mostly accounts for this island-wide trend, with more rain corresponding to higher probabilities. This is also observed using local explainability methods-SHAP, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations, and Break Down-for the respective predictions on three potential conservation sites. The cumulative effect of bioclimatic features in these ~ 1 km

Indexed as

Animal DistributionArtificial IntelligenceConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsPhilippinesSwineInterpretable machine learningRegularizationSuidSurrogate modelTropical ecology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.