ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Development and external validation of a mixed-reality aneurysm clipping simulator.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, surgical treatment of cerebral aneurysms remains one of the most demanding disciplines in neurosurgery. The increasing shift toward endovascular interventions leads to a decline in open surgical cases. This fact leaves residents and young neurosurgeons with fewer training opportunities and limited to complex and high-risk aneurysms. There is a growing need for realistic simulation tools to enhance neurosurgical training and preoperative planning. We developed and externally validated a patient-specific mixed-reality simulator for cerebral aneurysm clipping, during the research project "Medical EDUcation in Surgical Aneurysm Clipping (MEDUSA)". Our approach combines physical phantoms of the skull and brain tissue with virtual intracranial blood vessels, including a virtual intracranial aneurysm. Real surgical instruments provide an immersive training environment featuring integrated blood flow simulation for evaluating clipping strategies. A life-sized skull with silicone brain lobes is mounted in a standard neurosurgical head clamp. Optical tracking synchronizes the position of a real clip applier and an emulated surgical microscope with the corresponding virtual environment, allowing true mixed-reality interaction. After aneurysm clipping, blood flow is automatically simulated to assess residual aneurysms or stenoses of the parental vessels. We conducted an external validation with 40 neurosurgeons at two international events. Participants completed a 32-item questionnaire evaluating face and content validity on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants' surgical experience ranged from novice to expert (> 15 years). Average ratings for simulator realism and educational value were high, with mean scores between 3.13 and 4.25. The highest ratings were for the blood flow simulation (4.25) and the simulator's potential for preoperative planning (4.20). Most participants agreed that the physical and virtual components were valuable and that the simulator should be integrated into neurosurgical training and standard surgical workflows. Our mixed-reality simulator achieved robust face and content validity among a diverse group of neurosurgeons. Combining real surgical instruments with a deformable virtual aneurysm model, including blood flow simulation, offers a high level of realism and immediate objective feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.