ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Validation of the Hebrew version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test: a cross-sectional study in an Israeli cohort.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation of Local Nasal Biomarkers and Olfactory Dysfunction in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Pooled it
- Emotional Burden of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Psychological Cluster Analysis from a Tertiary Smell and Taste Clinic.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOlfactory dysfunction (OD) significantly impacts quality of life, affecting emotional well-being, nutrition, and social interaction. In Israel, where Hebrew is the dominant language, a culturally and linguistically validated olfactory assessment tool is essential. The "Sniffin' Sticks" test is a widely used psychophysical method that evaluates olfactory performance using threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) scores. To date, no validated Hebrew version of the test exists.
methodsA Hebrew version of the identification component (He-I) of the "Sniffin' Sticks" was developed using a standardized forward-backward translation process. Participants completed the full TDI test battery, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), and subjective measures, including a visual analog scale (VAS) for olfactory impairment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α).
resultsA total of 121 participants were included: 76 patients with olfactory dysfunction and 45 healthy controls. The He-I score showed strong correlations with both TDI (r = 0.93) and UPSIT (r = 0.86). ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881, with 93.3% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity at a cut-off score of 10.5. Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.86). VAS scores demonstrated moderate correlation with objective olfactory scores (r = - 0.62, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe Hebrew version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" identification test is a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tool for evaluating olfactory function in Hebrew-speaking populations in Israel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41062839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.