ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of an age estimation model based on dental characteristics using panoramic radiographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Third molar maturity on panoramic radiographs as an indicator of the 18-year threshold: a pilot cases study.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Machine learning approach for adult age estimation using dental characteristics on panoramic radiographs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental characteristics have considerable potential as indicators for estimating chronological age. This study developed a regression model for age estimation using dental characteristics observed in panoramic radiographs. A total of 2,391 radiographs from individuals aged 20 to 89 years were analyzed, with a focus on five treatment-induced characteristics. Analyses revealed statistically significant correlations between all observed characteristics and chronological age, supporting the potential of dental characteristics as novel age indicators. A model incorporating only posterior teeth from both jaws achieved an adjusted R-squared value of 0.564 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 13.144 years, closely comparable to the full-dentition model, which had values of 0.558 and 13.235 years, respectively, and is regarded as the most recommendable model for practical application. On the same test set, the developed model had an RMSE that was 2.651 years higher than that of a non-destructive method widely used in Korean forensic practice, indicating slightly lower accuracy. Nevertheless, given its convenience in forensic practice, it should be considered a supplementary tool used alongside conventional methods rather than a direct replacement. Future research should leverage diverse datasets from multiple institutions and apply advanced technologies, such as machine learning, to enhance the applicability and robustness of dental characteristic-based models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.