ArticleCommunications biology2025
Evaluating the temporal order of motor and auditory systems in speech production using intracranial EEG.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distributed cortico-subcortical networks enable robust speech state detection from sparse intracranial recordings.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theories propose that speech production can be approximated as a temporal reversal of speech perception. For example, phonological code is assumed to precede phonetic encoding in the motor system during speech production. However, empirical neural evidence directly testing the temporal order hypothesis remains scarce, mostly because of motor artifacts in non-invasive electrophysiology recordings and the requirements of both temporal and spatial precision. In this study, we investigated the neural dynamics of speech production using stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG). In both onset latency analysis and representational similarity analysis (RSA), activation in the auditory region of the posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) was observed before articulation, suggesting the availability of auditory phonological code before production. Surprisingly, the activation in the motor region of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) preceded that of pSTG, suggesting that the phonological code in the auditory domain may not necessarily be activated before the encoding in the motor domain during speech production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.