Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062745›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

CT-based radiomics nomogram to predict response of advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Chuan-Qinyuan Zhou, Yue-Su Wang, Wen-Han Liao, Jing-Ke Li, Xin-Yi Liao, Yan Gui, Xiao-Ming Zhang, Tian-Wu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chuan-Qinyuan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yue-Su WangMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Wen-Han LiaoMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Jing-Ke LiMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Xin-Yi LiaoMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Yan GuiDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Xiao-Ming ZhangMedical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Tian-Wu ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, 400010, Chongqing, China. chentw@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-3429

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish and validate a CT-based radiomics model to predict the response of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

methods259 consecutive AEG patients, receiving 3 cycles of NAC with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1, were retrospectively retrieved from two centers. Patients from center 1 were randomly divided into training (n = 139) and internal validation (n = 60) cohorts. Patients from center 2 were assigned to the external validation cohort (n = 60). In the training cohort, tumour-region-based radiomics features were selected, and a radiomics model was established to differentiate between patients with disease control and those with disease progression. Clinical factors were selected to develop a clinical model, and were incorporated with radiomics features to develop a radiomics-clinical model. Models' predictive performance and calibration ability were assessed with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration curve analysis, respectively. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit of the models.

resultsThe radiomics model was developed with 9 core radiomics features, the clinical model was established by incorporating gross tumor volume, cT stage and Siewert type, and the clinical-radiomics model was established and plotted the nomogram. The clinical-radiomics model obtained better performance than the clinical or radiomics model (AUCs: 0.903 vs. 0.824 or 0.823, 0.899 vs. 0.813 or 0.800, and 0.895 vs. 0.804 or 0.719) in training, internal validation and external validation sets, respectively. The clinical-radiomics model showed the best calibration ability and the highest net benefit.

conclusionThe clinical-radiomics model can well predict the response of AEG to NAC. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We provided a radiomics-clinical model to well predict the response of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which can help select appropriate patients to undergo chemotherapy, avoiding inappropriate patients from enduring toxic side-effects due to chemotherapy and delaying other treatments. KEY POINTS: A radiomics model for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction can predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A combined model integrating clinical and radiomics features can improve predictive performance. The combined model is helpful for clinicians to develop individualized treatment regimens.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaComputed tomographyEsophagogastric junctionNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41062745
PMCPMC12508337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.