ArticleInsights into imaging2025
CT-based radiomics nomogram to predict response of advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo establish and validate a CT-based radiomics model to predict the response of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
methods259 consecutive AEG patients, receiving 3 cycles of NAC with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1, were retrospectively retrieved from two centers. Patients from center 1 were randomly divided into training (n = 139) and internal validation (n = 60) cohorts. Patients from center 2 were assigned to the external validation cohort (n = 60). In the training cohort, tumour-region-based radiomics features were selected, and a radiomics model was established to differentiate between patients with disease control and those with disease progression. Clinical factors were selected to develop a clinical model, and were incorporated with radiomics features to develop a radiomics-clinical model. Models' predictive performance and calibration ability were assessed with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration curve analysis, respectively. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit of the models.
resultsThe radiomics model was developed with 9 core radiomics features, the clinical model was established by incorporating gross tumor volume, cT stage and Siewert type, and the clinical-radiomics model was established and plotted the nomogram. The clinical-radiomics model obtained better performance than the clinical or radiomics model (AUCs: 0.903 vs. 0.824 or 0.823, 0.899 vs. 0.813 or 0.800, and 0.895 vs. 0.804 or 0.719) in training, internal validation and external validation sets, respectively. The clinical-radiomics model showed the best calibration ability and the highest net benefit.
conclusionThe clinical-radiomics model can well predict the response of AEG to NAC. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We provided a radiomics-clinical model to well predict the response of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which can help select appropriate patients to undergo chemotherapy, avoiding inappropriate patients from enduring toxic side-effects due to chemotherapy and delaying other treatments. KEY POINTS: A radiomics model for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction can predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A combined model integrating clinical and radiomics features can improve predictive performance. The combined model is helpful for clinicians to develop individualized treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.