ArticleInfection2026
Back to the wildtype: SARS-CoV-2 evolution in critically ill patients with severe lung failure.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate intra-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in critically ill patients with severe lung failure.
methodsBetween November 2020 to December 2022, respiratory samples were collected from 41 mechanically ventilated patients at the intensive care unit of University Hospital Regensburg, Germany, including 16 on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Paired initial and follow-up samples were obtained at a median interval of 15 days (range: 6–42) and analyzed using next-generation sequencing. Amino acid substitutions in the viral genome were correlated with clinical, virological, immunological, and therapeutic markers using binary logistic regression.
resultsSeventeen of 41 patients (41%) developed amino acid substitutions in non-structural proteins (nsp2, 3, 4, 10, 12, 14, and 15), ORF3a, ORF8, and structural proteins (spike and nucleocapsid). Among 27 identified mutations, 21 were single nucleotide polymorphisms, and 6 were nucleotide deletions (3 single, 3 multiple). Notably, 20 mutations (74.1%) represented reversions to the ancestral Wuhan-1 sequence, including eight at position 323 in nsp12. Mutation occurrence was significantly associated with younger age, prolonged ICU stay, ECMO therapy, catecholamine use, thrombotic events, extended viral replication, and Delta variant infection (p < 0.05), whereas Remdesivir therapy showed a negative association. Multivariate analysis confirmed younger age, prolonged replication, and ECMO as independent predictors of intra-host viral evolution.
conclusionsIntra-host SARS-CoV-2 evolution in critically ill patients is driven by disease severity and prolonged viral replication. Frequent reversions to the ancestral sequence suggest selective pressure favoring wildtype variants in inflamed and hypoxic lung areas – a process attenuated by the administration of Remdesivir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.