ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension by Integrating Multimodal Data with a Hybrid Graph Convolutional and Transformer Network.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH), including differentiating pre-capillary from post-capillary PH, is crucial for guiding effective clinical management. This study developed and validated a deep learning-based diagnostic model to classify patients into non-PH, pre-capillary PH, or post-capillary PH categories. A retrospective dataset from 204 patients (112 pre-capillary PH, 32 post-capillary PH, and 60 non-PH controls) was collected at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, with diagnoses confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC). Patients were randomly divided into training (186 patients, 90%) and testing sets (18 patients, 10%) stratified by diagnostic category. We trained and evaluated the model using 35 repeated random splits. The proposed deep learning model combined graph convolutional networks (GCN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and Transformers to analyze multimodal data, including cine short-axis (SAX) sequences, four-chamber (4CH) sequences, and clinical parameters. Across test splits, the model achieved an overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.814 ± 0.06 and accuracy (ACC) of 0.734 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD). Class-specific AUCs were 0.745 ± 0.11 for non-PH, 0.863 ± 0.06 for pre-capillary PH, and 0.834 ± 0.10 for post-capillary PH, indicating good discriminative ability. This study demonstrated three-class PH classification using multimodal inputs. By fusing imaging and clinical data, the model may support accurate and timely clinical decision-making in PH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.