ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Radiogenomics for Glioblastoma Survival Prediction: Integrating Radiomics, Clinical, and Genomic Features Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding glioblastoma evolution and heterogeneity through mechanistic modeling: implications for clinical translation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- Brain Cancer: Molecular Alterations and Emerging Trends in Neuropharmacology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evolving Landscape of Glioblastoma Research: Integrating Therapeutic Advances and Diagnostic Frontiers.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- MRI-derived habitat heterogeneity for overall survival risk stratification in IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 glioblastoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Glioblastoma-A Contemporary Overview of Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment: A Review Article.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most formidable brain malignancies, characterized by a heterogeneous genetic profile that significantly influences patient prognosis. Per the 2021 WHO central nervous system classification, GBM is defined as an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type diffuse astrocytic tumor. We analyzed two multi-institutional cohorts, UPENN-GBM (644 patients) and UCSF-PDGM (420 patients); after excluding the 116 and 42 IDH-mutant records, 528 and 378 wild-type cases remained for modelling. MGMT promoter methylation, present in 43% of GBM cases, correlates with enhanced survival outcomes, demonstrating a median survival of 504 days versus 329 days in unmethylated cases. In this study, we present a novel integration of imaging phenotypes, clinical characteristics, and molecular markers through the application of advanced machine learning methodologies, including Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and an optimized dense neural network (Dense NN). This integrative approach aims to refine survival prediction in GBM patients. MRI data were meticulously processed using the MRIPreprocessor tool and the radiomics Python library, facilitating the extraction of high-dimensional radiomic features. Our findings reveal that the proposed custom Dense NN model outperformed traditional tree-based algorithms, with the Dense NN achieving a concordance index (CI) of 0.86 on the UPENN-GBM dataset and 0.83 on the UCSF-PDGM dataset. The optimized Dense NN architecture features three hidden layers with 256, 128, and 64 units respectively, employing ReLU activation, L1/L2 regularization to mitigate overfitting, batch normalization to stabilize training, and dropout for improved generalization. This specific configuration was determined through hyperparameter tuning using techniques like RandomizedSearchCV. This integrative, non-invasive methodology provides a more nuanced assessment of tumor biology, thereby advancing the development of personalized therapeutic strategies. Our results underscore the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in delineating disease trajectories and optimizing treatment paradigms. Moreover, this research establishes a robust framework for future investigations in glioblastoma survival prediction, illustrating the efficacy of combining clinical, genetic, and imaging data to enhance prognostic accuracy within precision medicine paradigms for GBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.