Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062725›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Artificial intelligence in student management systems to enhance academic performance monitoring and intervention.

Yueying Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yueying WangCollege of Law, YiLi Normal University, YiLi, 835000, XinJiang, China. 15769073433@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in student management systems (SMS) has gained significant attention, particularly for monitoring academic performance and predicting at-risk students. Traditional approaches often lack the necessary adaptability and predictive accuracy across different learning environments. A hybrid AI-based model is proposed to enhance academic performance monitoring and intervention strategies by integrating decision trees (DT), random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN). The objective is to assess the effectiveness of the hybrid approach across multiple datasets, including UCI student performance, open university learning analytics dataset (OULAD), and national educational longitudinal study (NELS:88). The hybrid model was trained using a combination of preprocessing techniques, including missing data imputation, feature selection, and data normalization. The performance of the hybrid model was compared to individual base models using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. The hybrid model achieved outstanding results, with an accuracy of 98.8% on the UCI dataset, surpassing the performance of individual models. The hybrid model consistently outperformed the base models across all datasets, reducing error rates by over 5%. The proposed hybrid AI model provides a robust, scalable solution for academic performance monitoring and early intervention, demonstrating its potential for deployment in diverse educational contexts to support at-risk students proactively.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceArtificial IntelligenceStudentsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineUniversitiesAcademic risk monitoringArtificial intelligenceEducational data miningHybrid machine learningLearning analyticsStudent performance prediction

Identifiers

PMID41062725
PMCPMC12508167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.