ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing education resource allocation using grey model forecasting of school age populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study enhances the applicability and accuracy of the Grey Model (GM) (1,1) for forecasting school-aged populations. This is achieved by employing a buffering operator to optimize school-aged population data, thereby reducing interference from policy changes and environmental factors. Additionally, Locally Weighted Linear Regression is introduced to refine the calculation of the developmental grey number and endogenous control grey number, which significantly improves the model's ability to fit volatile and complex data trends. Building upon the foundational GM(1,1) and grey system theory, an integrated predictive framework is developed to capture changes in school-aged population dynamics. The enhanced GM (1,1) model's performance is evaluated by comparing its residuals with those of the traditional GM (1,1) model, enabling assessment of the model's trend-fitting accuracy. Based on the population forecasts, tailored strategies for educational resource allocation are formulated. The dataset spans from 2013 to 2020, a period marked by profound socioeconomic shifts in China that generated distinct population mobility patterns. The results demonstrate marked improvements in the enhanced GM (1,1) model's predictive accuracy, as evidenced by significantly smaller residuals compared to the traditional model. For example, in 2018-2020, the traditional GM (1,1) model produced residuals of - 14.462, - 4.405, and 5.467, respectively, whereas the enhanced model's residuals were substantially reduced to 0.399, 0.132, and 3.707. These findings indicate that the proposed model more precisely captures the evolving trends of the school-aged population. The study proposes data-driven and scientifically grounded strategies for optimizing the allocation of educational resources, thus providing valuable guidance for education policy formulation and implementation. By integrating grey system theory with local regression techniques, this study presents a novel methodological approach that advances school-aged population prediction and educational resource planning, with both theoretical value and practical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.