ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning approach for detection of claustrophobic brain activity in electroencephalography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vibrotactile Stimulation Encoded by Beta and Gamma Bands Varies with Locations on the Upper Limbs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Are you afraid? Neurophysiological responses to multidimensional fear in an interactive semi-immersive environment.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Claustrophobia, a phobia with a specific unreasonable and excessive fear of enclosed spaces, can have a considerable impact on an individual's life. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been a tool with potential for studying neural processes in anxiety disorders including claustrophobia. In this work, a machine learning algorithm for differentiation between claustrophobic and healthy controls using EEG signals is presented. EEG data were collected from 22 participants under controlled conditions, and preprocessing included filtering, artifact removal, and feature extraction using relative Power Spectral Density (rPSD) across five frequency bands: delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. Classical machine learning models such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF) were applied to assess their suitability in this domain. In addition, deep learning models including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and a Convolutional Neural Network with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-BiLSTM) integration were utilized for their capacity to capture complex temporal and spatial patterns in EEG data. Performance testing with five-fold cross-validation revealed that MLP and CNN-BiLSTM performed best in terms of accuracy in classification, with a 95.15% ± 0.77 when all bands of frequencies were combined together. An analysis of brain regions revealed frontal and temporal regions to differentiate between claustrophobic and non-claustrophobic subjects, and beta and theta bands played a significant role in distinguishing between them. These observations unveil high potential for EEG-based machine learning algorithms in objective evaluation of claustrophobia, and propose opportunities for future development in its therapy and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.