ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of regularly changing enrichment on the cognitive judgement bias of laboratory rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The provision of environmental enrichment is a frequently used refinement method to improve welfare of laboratory animals. Compared to barren housing conditions, enrichment could decrease signs of impaired welfare, such as stress hormone concentrations and stereotypies. Moreover, the provision of enrichment was found to positively affect animals' emotional states, reflected by more optimistic judgements in cognitive bias paradigms. To investigate the impact of environmental enrichment beyond the classical comparison between barren and enriched housing, the aim of this study was to examine the influence of two different enrichment regimes on the cognitive judgement bias of laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus f. domestica). Twenty-one individuals were housed either under consistent enrichment or regular enrichment change for several months. Afterwards, they participated in a cognitive judgement bias test, which is based on ambiguous cue interpretations and enables a classification of rats as being optimistic or pessimistic. Interestingly, we found that rats from the enrichment-change group responded more optimistically in an ambiguous situation than rats from the consistent-enrichment group. It seems that the regular enrichment change could induce a more positive emotional state in our rats and, therefore, represents a simple but effective approach to improve welfare under laboratory conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.