ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Glidelift: No Visible Scar Approach to Periorbital Rejuvenation.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic suture-suspension midface lift.JPRAS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing number of younger individuals are now seeking facelift procedures not only for rejuvenation but also to enhance facial contours, particularly periorbital aesthetics and midface projection, while effective, endoscopic techniques often rely on suspension sutures, require specialized equipment, and are time intensive.
objectivesThis study introduces the Glidelift™ technique, a novel approach that ensures precise dissection under direct vision while avoiding visible scarring. It enables meticulous periorbital rejuvenation and reliable melo fat pad elevation, resulting in a refined facial contour.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 53 patients (48 females, 5 males) who underwent Glidelift™ between August 2021 and November 2023. The procedure involved concealed incisions, controlled dissection under direct vision, canthal shaping, plication of the melo fat pad to the lateral orbital rim, and the use of a surgical net for comprehensive brow and midface rejuvenation. Surgical outcomes were evaluated through clinical follow-ups, comparative photograph analysis, complication assessment, and patient satisfaction.
resultsThe mean patient age was 42.3 years (range 30-47), with a mean follow-up period of 17.3 months. The average surgical time was 123 ± 16 min. Clinical and photographic assessments demonstrated improved brow contour, a more defined canthal tilt, a shortened lower eyelid-cheek junction, and increased malar projection. Patient satisfaction was high for both periorbital shape and midface contour (p < 0.01).
conclusionsGlidelift™ represents a significant advancement in facial aesthetic surgery, combining the benefits of existing techniques while minimizing their limitations. Proper patient selection and thorough counseling remain essential for achieving optimal outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41062668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.