Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062652›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Judgment of crowds as emotional increases with the proportion of black faces.

Amit Goldenberg, Kyle LaFollette, Zi Huang, Erika Weisz, Mina Cikara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit Goldenberg *Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, USA. agoldenberg@hbs.edu.
Kyle LaFollette *The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Chicago, USA.
Zi HuangHarvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, USA.
Erika WeiszDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Mina CikaraDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research have sought to characterize how racialization affects the evaluation of faces. However, research has mostly focused on the perception of single faces. In the current project we address this gap by examining whether racialization affects crowd perception, even in the absence of perceived differences at the single-face level. In Experiments 1-2, participants viewed crowds of faces expressing different degrees of happiness or anger and different ratios of lighter-skinned faces (racialized as White) and darker-skinned faces (racialized as black). A higher proportion of Black faces led to a greater likelihood of perceiving the crowd as emotional. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect was not solely driven by the contrast between White and Black faces within a crowd, as crowds composed of entirely Black faces were more likely to be evaluated as emotional than crowds of White and Black faces. Using hierarchical drift diffusion models, we compared potential mechanisms and found that Black faces expressing emotions weighed more heavily than White faces in judging whether a crowd was emotional. These results shed light on an important way in which racialization impacts judgments of collective emotion.

Indexed as

EmotionsFaceFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionJudgmentAdultBlack PeopleFemaleHumansMaleRacismWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41062652
PMCPMC12508084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.