ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model integrating BUN/Cr ratio for mortality prediction in critically ill atrial fibrillation patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bar-Based Nomogram for Predicting Septic Shock in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Sepsis: Development and External Validation.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Association between blood urea nitrogen-to-creatinine ratio trajectories and mortality in patients with severe pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinically cardiovascular machine learning model for risk prediction via sample augmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent critical care arrhythmia, demonstrates substantial mortality associations where renal dysfunction management plays a pivotal therapeutic role. We examined the prognostic capacity of admission blood urea nitrogen-to-creatinine ratio (BUN/Cr) - a low-cost renal biomarker - for 28-/365-day mortality prediction in AF through multidimensional survival analyses leveraging the MIMIC-IV 3.1 database. Data relevant to AF patients were extracted from the publicly available MIMIC-IV 3.1 database based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) models were used to assess the association between the BUN/Cr and the risk of 28-day and 365-day mortality. Subsequently, a short-term and long-term mortality risk prediction model for AF patients was developed using interpretable machine learning algorithms, incorporating the BUN/Cr and other clinical features. The MIMIC-IV analysis included 14,725 AF patients (72.9 ± 11.7 years, 60.3% male). Cox regression identified BUN/Cr as an independent predictor of 28-day and 365-day mortality, with risk quintiles showing a non-linear pattern: Q5 (> 27.8), Q4 (22.0-27.8), Q1 (≤ 15.0), Q3 (18.5-22.0), and Q2 (15.0-18.5). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed decreasing survival with elevated BUN/Cr. Restricted cubic splines revealed U-shaped mortality relationships (P < 0.001), with inflection points at BUN/Cr = 16.49 (28-day) and 16.67 (365-day). Among machine learning models, XGBoost outperformed others in predicting mortality (28-day: AUC = 0.793 [0.776-0.810], Accuracy = 73.1%; 365-day: AUC = 0.778 [0.764-0.793], Accuracy = 69.8%). SHAP analysis ranked BUN/Cr fourth among predictors for both endpoints. The BUN/Cr emerged as a robust independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in AF. The interpretable XGBoost model, integrating BUN/Cr with clinical variables, achieved superior predictive accuracy for 28-/365-day outcomes while maintaining generalizability. BUN/Cr constituted a fourth-ranked feature across mortality timelines. These findings underscore its clinical utility for AF risk stratification and treatment optimization, supporting biomarker-guided therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.