ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a comprehensive model for management efficiency in agricultural enterprises amid digital transformation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study is devoted to assessing the effectiveness of enterprise innovation management in the context of digital transformation. The relevance of this research is determined by the need to develop a comprehensive methodology that enables diagnosing the level of companies' innovation activity and identifying priority directions for its advancement. The methodological framework includes a vector model for evaluating innovation management, indicator normalization, as well as correlation, cluster, and regression analyses. The empirical basis of the study comprises data from 24 Chinese companies operating in the agricultural sector. For each enterprise, the level of management efficiency was determined across three dimensions: innovation performance, innovation potential, and financial support of digital innovation processes. The key findings indicate that innovation potential (0.794) and financial support of innovation processes (0.683) exert the strongest influence on the formation of the innovation management vector, whereas innovation performance demonstrates a comparatively weaker effect (0.334). Hierarchical clustering made it possible to distinguish four groups of companies by their level of innovation activity: low, moderate, significant, and high, which provides opportunities for comprehensive diagnostics and benchmarking. The developed regression models confirm the reliability of the assessments and enable forecasting changes in innovation performance depending on variations in the three key indicators. The proposed methodology can be practically applied for evaluating enterprise innovation management, determining priority development pathways, and designing strategies for digital transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.