ArticleScientific reports2025
Road safety measurement with reliability using an advanced hybrid decision model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a brand-new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that combines High-Dimensional Vector Projection (HDVP) and Between-class Variance Maximization (BeVarMax), termed the HDVP-BeVarMax model, aiming to provide trustworthy decisions and defensible policy conclusions. Specifically, HDVP quantifies the relative proximity of each country to an ideal performance vector in a high-dimensional space, ensuring scale-invariant and geometrically meaningful aggregation. BeVarMax, inspired by Otsu's thresholding method, maximizes between-class variance to identify optimal groupings and uncover latent structure among alternatives, surpassing conventional clustering techniques such as k-means in robustness and global optimality. Using longitudinal data from 13 East Asia Summit (EAS) countries spanning 2012 to 2023, this model is applied to measure national road safety performance based on 15 tailored safety performance indicators (SPIs). Results demonstrate the model's reliability, robustness, and superior discriminative power across normalization and weighting schemes, validated through extensive sensitivity and benchmarking analyses. Policy implications are twofold: it enables benchmarking of high and low performers to guide targeted interventions, and it supports strategic resource allocation by identifying priority areas such as enforcement, infrastructure, and behavioral factors. The proposed model serves as a practical decision-support tool for monitoring progress and fostering regional cooperation in line with global road safety goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.