Observational studyScientific reports2025
Point-of-care lung ultrasound to differentiate bacterial and viral lower respiratory tract infections in pediatric age: a multicenter prospective observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung Ultrasound in Children: Principles, Techniques, and Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lung ultrasound combined with C-reactive protein for identifying a bacterial component in children hospitalized with acute lower respiratory tract infections: a prospective observational study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Ten Questions on Using Lung Ultrasonography to Diagnose and Manage Pneumonia in Hospital-at-Home Model: Part III-Synchronicity and Foresight.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lung Ultrasound Findings in Pediatric Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis and monitoring of community-acquired pneumonia in children: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing between bacterial and viral etiologies in children with Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) is challenging. This study investigates the association between lung Point-of-Care ultrasound (POCUS) characteristics and the etiologic diagnosis of LRTI. This multicenter, prospective, observational study included children admitted with suspected LRTI to three pediatric centers in Italy. Lung POCUS was performed within six hours of clinical diagnosis, alongside collection of clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and radiological data. Patients were stratified into groups based on presumed microbial etiology: bacterial pneumonia (confirmed or probable) and viral pneumonia (confirmed or probable). 162 children were admitted, 90 with viral pneumonia (74 confirmed, 16 probable), and 72 with bacterial pneumonia (15 confirmed, 57 probable). The lung POCUS score was higher in bacterial infections compared to viral ones (mean score of 32 vs. 27.5, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that models incorporating POCUS (AUC = 0.88) or chest X-ray (CXR) findings (AUC = 0.89), along with a minimal amount of clinical and laboratory findings, were both accurate in establishing the pneumonia etiology. The study indicates that lung POCUS is a valuable tool that can support clinical and laboratory items in the diagnostic process of LRTI. These results also suggest that POCUS can be as effective as CXR in aiding diagnosis, providing solid evidence for a radiation-free alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.