ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning reveals limited predictive value of clinical factors for asthma exacerbations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While predictors of asthma exacerbation risk are generally well established, predictors of exacerbation severity remain largely undefined. Identifying robust clinical predictors of exacerbation severity is essential to support tailored management strategies and optimize resource allocation. This study leverages machine learning to evaluate the predictive value of clinical factors for exacerbation severity in a real-world emergency department setting. A retrospective cohort study was performed using medical records of 367 adults (644 exacerbations) who presented to the Amsterdam UMC emergency department between 2013 and 2020. Five severity outcomes were investigated: hospital admission, ICU admission, length of stay, oxygenation efficiency (SpO₂/FiO₂), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Associations were assessed using linear mixed models (LMM), and predictive modelling employed a machine learning approach combining LMMs with fivefold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Exacerbation severity was most consistently associated with lung function, the presence of a radiographic chest infiltrate, C-reactive protein levels, blood neutrophil count and theophylline maintenance use. No significant associations were found for blood eosinophil count, age, comorbidities, symptom duration, triggers, allergic sensitization, ethnicity or exacerbation history within the preceding 12 months. Internally validated prediction models for hospital and intensive care admission achieved areas under the curve of 0.632 and 0.695, respectively. The strongest predictors explained 18.8% of variability in NEWS, 15.2% in oxygenation efficiency, and 9.0% in length of hospital stay. In these prediction models, a radiographic chest infiltrate, followed by theophylline maintenance use and blood neutrophil count, were most frequently associated across the five severity outcomes. To conclude, lung function and markers of acute respiratory infection were most frequently associated with asthma exacerbation severity. However, clinical and demographic variables have only modest predictive value, highlighting the need to identify additional robust predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.