ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanisms by which environmental regulation and social network embeddedness influence farmers' ecological efficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the key drivers of ecological efficiency improvement among forest farmers is essential for advancing the reform of the collective forest tenure system and promoting the modernization of forestry. Based on survey data from 324 hazelnut farmers in Tieling City, Liaoning Province, this study developed an analytical framework that links external regulation, internal network embeddedness, and ecological efficiency. A super-efficiency Slack-Based Measure (SBM) model was employed to assess production efficiency, and the effects of environmental regulation and social network embeddedness on ecological efficiency were systematically investigated, along with their interaction mechanisms. The results showed that environmental regulation had a significant positive effect on ecological efficiency, with coercive regulation exerting the strongest influence, significantly exceeding that of incentive-based and guidance-based approaches. Social network embeddedness also significantly enhanced ecological efficiency, with degree centrality having the most significant impact, followed by betweenness and closeness centrality. Moreover, the interaction effects between environmental regulation and centrality indicators displayed heterogeneous characteristics. Based on these findings, the study proposes three policy implications: (1) the government should strengthen regulatory enforcement and fiscal incentives, complemented by awareness campaigns and technical training to improve farmers' environmental consciousness; (2) farmer cooperation and information-sharing platforms should be encouraged to enhance capacity building and optimize social network structures; (3) differentiated policy interventions should be developed according to interaction patterns to leverage network-driven spillovers, motivating farmers to act as role models in the green transition and improving regulatory effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.