ArticleScientific reports2025
Histopathological classification of colorectal cancer based on domain-specific transfer learning and multi-model feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Generalizable Multimodal Model for Treatment-Stratified Risk and Survival Assessment under Real-World Constraints: A Multi-Center Study of Colorectal Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Colorectal cancer diagnosis method based on dynamic gland-aware and tissue soft-clustering].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health burden, where early and accurate diagnosis is vital to improving patient outcomes. However, the structural complexity of CRC histopathological images renders manual analysis time-consuming and error-prone. This study aims to develop an automated deep learning framework that enhances classification accuracy and efficiency in CRC diagnosis. The proposed model integrates domain-specific transfer learning and multi-model feature fusion to address challenges such as multi-scale structures, noisy labels, class imbalance, and fine-grained subtype classification. The model first applies domain-specific transfer learning to extract highly relevant features from histopathological images. A multi-head self-attention mechanism then fuses features from multiple pre-trained models, followed by a multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier for final prediction. The framework was evaluated on three publicly available CRC datasets: EBHI, Chaoyang, and COAD. The model achieved a classification accuracy of 99.68% on the EBHI dataset (200 × subset), 86.72% on the Chaoyang dataset, and 99.44% on the COAD dataset. These results demonstrate strong generalization across diverse and complex histopathological image conditions. This study highlights the effectiveness of combining domain-specific transfer learning with multi-model feature fusion and attention mechanisms for CRC classification. The proposed model offers a reliable and efficient tool to support pathologists in diagnostic workflows, with the potential to reduce manual workload and improve diagnostic consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.