ArticleScientific reports2025
Lane-change risk prediction model based on traffic context and driving styles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lane-change risk prediction models are critical for enhancing driving safety and reducing traffic accidents. However, existing studies have not sufficiently considered the effects of traffic context and driving styles on lane change risk, limiting their adaptability in complex traffic environments. This study proposes a lane-change risk prediction model that integrates traffic context and driving styles. The traffic context model identifies different lane changing types using Attention-LSTM by analyzing traffic levels and vehicle types; The LSTM-Stacked Denoising Autoencoder (LSTM-SDAE) identifies and further characterizes distinct driving styles. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) algorithm predicts lane change risk using the Lane Change Risk Index derived from driving styles (LCRI_DS), and applies Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to analyze feature importance across different LC types. The results show that incorporating traffic context improves the model's prediction accuracy from 88.79 to 95.05%. The LGBM algorithm, combined with traffic context and driving style features, outperforms other algorithms. Feature importance analysis reveals that the risk of left lane changes is primarily influenced by the vehicle's lateral velocity, the relative longitudinal velocity to the preceding vehicle in the target lane, and the driving style, whereas the risk of right lane changes is more strongly associated with the relative longitudinal velocities to following vehicles in both the current and target lanes, along with the driving style. This work provides valuable insights for improving driving safety and developing decision-support systems in complex traffic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.