Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062572›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Lane-change risk prediction model based on traffic context and driving styles.

Yingwei Ren, Fangzheng Li, Zihe Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yingwei RenCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China.
Fangzheng LiCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China. 202383160017@sdust.edu.cn.
Zihe LiCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lane-change risk prediction models are critical for enhancing driving safety and reducing traffic accidents. However, existing studies have not sufficiently considered the effects of traffic context and driving styles on lane change risk, limiting their adaptability in complex traffic environments. This study proposes a lane-change risk prediction model that integrates traffic context and driving styles. The traffic context model identifies different lane changing types using Attention-LSTM by analyzing traffic levels and vehicle types; The LSTM-Stacked Denoising Autoencoder (LSTM-SDAE) identifies and further characterizes distinct driving styles. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) algorithm predicts lane change risk using the Lane Change Risk Index derived from driving styles (LCRI_DS), and applies Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to analyze feature importance across different LC types. The results show that incorporating traffic context improves the model's prediction accuracy from 88.79 to 95.05%. The LGBM algorithm, combined with traffic context and driving style features, outperforms other algorithms. Feature importance analysis reveals that the risk of left lane changes is primarily influenced by the vehicle's lateral velocity, the relative longitudinal velocity to the preceding vehicle in the target lane, and the driving style, whereas the risk of right lane changes is more strongly associated with the relative longitudinal velocities to following vehicles in both the current and target lanes, along with the driving style. This work provides valuable insights for improving driving safety and developing decision-support systems in complex traffic environments.

Indexed as

Driving style recognitionLane-change risk predictionLane-change type classificationLight gradient boosting machine (LGBM)Traffic context modeling

Identifiers

PMID41062572
PMCPMC12508439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.