ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of higher education based on machine learning on subjective well-being.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile phone dependence, internet credit use, and subjective well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The impact of peer relationships and employment pressure on the learning wellbeing of university students in the post-2000s generation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As higher education becomes increasingly prevalent and accessible in China, a growing number of residents are afforded the option to pursue advanced studies. Can higher education genuinely enhance residents' subjective well-being? The response to this enquiry necessitates additional investigation. This study selected 5 wave data of Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), a total of 53,874 samples. Machine learning methodologies, including XGBoost and GBDT, were utilised for the inaugural correlation investigation between higher education and subjective well-being in China. Feature importance sorting elucidated the nonlinear correlations and interaction effects, such as the threshold effect of social fairness cognition on happiness, that typical regression models struggle to capture. (1) The average subjective well-being of the higher education group (4.005309) was significantly higher than that of the non-higher education group (3.835478), and the education level had a significant positive predictive role on subjective well-being (p = 0.000 < 0.05); (2) Machine learning uncovers substantial correlations between higher education and subjective well-being ([Formula: see text]=0.008, p < 0.01), with social justice cognition (feature weight=0.32) and self-rated health (0.28) identified as primary mediators. (3) The proportion of women in the highest level of well-being ([4.0,5.0)] was slightly higher than that of men. Higher education can markedly enhance the subjective well-being of individuals. Furthermore, it improves residents' subjective well-being via social justice perception, self-assessed health, social class identity, job satisfaction, and socio-economic status. This establishes a scientific foundation for the government and all societal sectors to augment investment in education, enhance the distribution of educational resources, and foster the comprehensive development of individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.