ArticleScientific reports2025
The effects of the human-like features of generative AI on usage intention and the moderating role of information overload.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots on e-commerce platforms, users’ expectations for anthropomorphic service experiences have risen significantly. Despite the growing presence of GenAI, little is known about how different types of anthropomorphic users’ self-efficacy and the intention to adopt as a decision aid through distinct cognitive pathways. Addressing this research gap, this study draws on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates central and peripheral cues. Using large-scale survey data from e-commerce users and structural equation modeling, the research empirically examines the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating effect of information overload. Results indicate that human-like empathy and perceived warmth (peripheral cues) and perceived competence (central cue) all significantly enhance self-efficacy, which in turn positively influences the intention to adopt as a decision aid. Moreover, information overload intensifies the effect of peripheral cues on self-efficacy but has a limited impact on central cues. These findings advance the theoretical understanding of GenAI–human interaction by clarifying the mechanisms through which anthropomorphic features operate, and provide actionable insights for designing user-centric GenAI recommendation services to optimize user experience and encourage the intention to adopt as a decision aid in e-commerce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.