Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effects of the human-like features of generative AI on usage intention and the moderating role of information overload.

Xiyang Li, Tingfa Zhou, Chao Hu, Haibin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiyang LiSchool of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Minden, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Tingfa ZhouJiujiang Polytechnic University of Science and Technology, Jiujiang, 332020, China. tingfazhou@yeah.net.
Chao HuJiujiang Polytechnic University of Science and Technology, Jiujiang, 332020, China.
Haibin LiuInstitut Montpellier Management, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, 34960, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots on e-commerce platforms, users’ expectations for anthropomorphic service experiences have risen significantly. Despite the growing presence of GenAI, little is known about how different types of anthropomorphic users’ self-efficacy and the intention to adopt as a decision aid through distinct cognitive pathways. Addressing this research gap, this study draws on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates central and peripheral cues. Using large-scale survey data from e-commerce users and structural equation modeling, the research empirically examines the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating effect of information overload. Results indicate that human-like empathy and perceived warmth (peripheral cues) and perceived competence (central cue) all significantly enhance self-efficacy, which in turn positively influences the intention to adopt as a decision aid. Moreover, information overload intensifies the effect of peripheral cues on self-efficacy but has a limited impact on central cues. These findings advance the theoretical understanding of GenAI–human interaction by clarifying the mechanisms through which anthropomorphic features operate, and provide actionable insights for designing user-centric GenAI recommendation services to optimize user experience and encourage the intention to adopt as a decision aid in e-commerce.

Indexed as

Generative Artificial IntelligenceIntentionAdultFemaleHumansMaleSelf EfficacyAnthropomorphismGenerative artificial intelligence chatbotsInformation overloadSelf-efficacyThe intention to adopt as a decision aid

Identifiers

PMID41062558
PMCPMC12508174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.