ArticleScientific reports2025
A popular validated home monitor uses the maximum oscillogram amplitude to compute blood pressure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oscillometric cuff devices are believed to use fixed ratio algorithms to compute blood pressure (BP) from the oscillogram (cuff pressure oscillation height versus applied cuff pressure function). However, variations in the cuff transducer that occur each time the cuff is wrapped on a given arm and variations in pulse pressure can alter the oscillogram shape and the ratios for computing BP. A popular validated home BP monitor was studied to determine whether and how it considers these effects. The monitor, with its Universal cuff placed on four different mandrels, was analyzed using a non-invasive BP simulator at various settings and an external pressure sensor to construct the oscillograms. Several algorithms were tested to estimate the home monitor BP values. A fixed ratio algorithm estimated the home monitor systolic and diastolic BP with errors of 5.8 and 1.5 mmHg. A variable ratio algorithm in which the ratios go inversely with the maximum oscillogram amplitude estimated the home monitor values with errors of just 1.5 and 0.8 mmHg. Using the maximum oscillogram amplitude may be particularly helpful for mitigating the variable pulse pressure effect. This study shows how oscillometric cuff devices likely work, which is important for understanding and improving their accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.