Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062545›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing high dimensional data classification with a hybrid AI driven feature selection framework and machine learning schema.

Amina Salhi, Rayan Alshamrani, Ashrf Althbiti, Atef Ismail, Manar Abd-ElRahman, Basma M Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amina SalhiDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan AlshamraniDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O.Box 11099, 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Ashrf AlthbitiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O.Box 11099, 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Atef IsmailPhysics Department, Al-Azhar University, Asyut, 71524, Egypt.
Manar Abd-ElRahmanDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Basma M HassanFaculty of Artificial Intelligence, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt. basma.mohamed@ai.kfs.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature selection (FS) is critical for datasets with multiple variables and features, as it helps eliminate irrelevant elements, thereby improving classification accuracy. Numerous classification strategies are effective in selecting key features from datasets with a high number of variables. In this study, experiments were conducted using three well-known datasets: the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnostic dataset, the Sonar dataset, and the Differentiated Thyroid Cancer dataset. FS is particularly relevant for four key reasons: reducing model complexity by minimizing the number of parameters, decreasing training time, enhancing the generalization capabilities of models, and avoiding the curse of dimensionality. We evaluated the performance of several classification algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machines (SVM). The most effective classifier was determined based on the highest level of accuracy. Additionally, this research introduces hybrid algorithms such as TMGWO (Two-phase Mutation Grey Wolf Optimization), ISSA (Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm), and BBPSO (Binary Black Particle Swarm Optimization) for identifying significant features for classification. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the performance of these hybrid FS algorithms from various perspectives. We also compared the performance of classifiers on datasets with and without FS, measuring improvements in accuracy, precision, and recall. Among the algorithms tested, the TMGWO hybrid approach achieved superior results, outperforming the other experimental methods in both feature selection and classification accuracy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansSupport Vector MachineThyroid NeoplasmsCurse of dimensionalityDimensionality reductionFeature selectionGeneralization enhancementHybrid algorithmsModel complexity reduction

Identifiers

PMID41062545
PMCPMC12508058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.