ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing high dimensional data classification with a hybrid AI driven feature selection framework and machine learning schema.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study of quantum-inspired PSO and EA with their binary variants for heart disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-Dimensional Feature Selection Using Improved Hybrid Breeding Optimization Algorithm with Feature Grouping.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of oil yield in sunflower using deep learning regression algorithm under normal and drought stress conditions.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Swarm Intelligence in Drug Discovery Applications: Unlocking Deeper Insights on the Identification and Optimization of Potential Drug Candidates.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feature selection (FS) is critical for datasets with multiple variables and features, as it helps eliminate irrelevant elements, thereby improving classification accuracy. Numerous classification strategies are effective in selecting key features from datasets with a high number of variables. In this study, experiments were conducted using three well-known datasets: the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnostic dataset, the Sonar dataset, and the Differentiated Thyroid Cancer dataset. FS is particularly relevant for four key reasons: reducing model complexity by minimizing the number of parameters, decreasing training time, enhancing the generalization capabilities of models, and avoiding the curse of dimensionality. We evaluated the performance of several classification algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machines (SVM). The most effective classifier was determined based on the highest level of accuracy. Additionally, this research introduces hybrid algorithms such as TMGWO (Two-phase Mutation Grey Wolf Optimization), ISSA (Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm), and BBPSO (Binary Black Particle Swarm Optimization) for identifying significant features for classification. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the performance of these hybrid FS algorithms from various perspectives. We also compared the performance of classifiers on datasets with and without FS, measuring improvements in accuracy, precision, and recall. Among the algorithms tested, the TMGWO hybrid approach achieved superior results, outperforming the other experimental methods in both feature selection and classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.