Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062540›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Accelerated age-hardening kinetics in additively manufactured 18Ni(300) maraging steel.

Shahrzad Sajjadivand, Mark Hartnett, Lu Yang, Wajira Mirihanage, Mert Celikin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahrzad SajjadivandSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, UCD, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Mark HartnettIrish Manufacturing Research, Mullingar, N91 TX80, Ireland.
Lu YangDepartment of Materials Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Wajira MirihanageDepartment of Materials Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Mert CelikinSchool of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, UCD, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland. mert.celikin@ucd.ie.

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 16/RC/3872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this comparative study between Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) versus conventional hot-rolled 18Ni(300) maraging steel, accelerated age-hardening kinetics was determined due to the variation in annealing behaviour. Conventionally produced 18Ni(300) maraging steel exhibited significant grain growth upon solution annealing at 850-1050 °C, which was not evident in the L-PBF counterpart where oxide particles present in as-built condition inhibited grain growth. Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) analysis showed higher thermal stability of additively manufactured components up to 1050 °C, where significant grain growth was found in hot-rolled and annealed parts. Despite these differences, both processing routes achieved similar peak hardness after ageing, although L-PBF samples displayed faster initial hardening due to enhanced precipitation kinetics linked to finer grain structure and higher grain boundary density.

Indexed as

Age-hardeningElectron Back-Scatter diffraction (EBSD)Laser-based powder bed fusion (L-PBF)Maraging steel

Identifiers

PMID41062540
PMCPMC12508146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.