ArticleIndustrial health2026
Associations between work style and sleep health indicators among Japanese workers: a comparison by chronotype.
Article in Industrial health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working from home (WFH) is considered beneficial for sleep and fatigue recovery; however, it may vary according to chronotype. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between work style, sleep, and health, focusing on different chronotypes. A total of 1,114 workers completed an anonymous online survey, and 587 adult workers were included in the study. Changes in sleep and health indicators were compared by chronotype between the periods when participants worked at the workplace (WAW) every day and WFH two days or more a week. During the WFH period, sleep duration was longer and insomnia level was lower for all chronotypes than that during the WAW period. Evening chronotypes had higher risks of insomnia, poor mental health, and poor fatigue recovery during WAW than did morning chronotypes. However, regarding mental health impairment, the relationship by chronotype disappeared during the WFH period. WFH two days or more a week may provide benefits with respect to sleep and fatigue recovery, regardless of chronotype, particularly for mental health of evening chronotype; however, evening chronotypes had lower level of sleep and health than did other chronotypes, regardless of work style.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.