Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062282›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Space Impacts Temporal Processing via a Visual-Dependent Spatially Organized Neural Architecture.

Maria Bianca Amadeo, Cristiano Cuppini, Alessia Tonelli, Carolina Tammurello, Walter Setti, Claudio Campus, Sabrina Signorini, Elena Cocchi, Margherita Bonino, Francesca Tinelli and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria Bianca AmadeoUnit for Visually Impaired People (U-VIP), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa 16152, Italy mariabianca.amadeo@iit.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9601-0187
Cristiano CuppiniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6529-2599
Alessia TonelliUnit for Visually Impaired People (U-VIP), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa 16152, Italy.
Carolina TammurelloUnit for Visually Impaired People (U-VIP), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa 16152, Italy.
Walter SettiUnit for Visually Impaired People (U-VIP), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa 16152, Italy.
Claudio CampusUnit for Visually Impaired People (U-VIP), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa 16152, Italy.
Sabrina SignoriniDevelopmental Neurophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia 27100, Italy.
Elena CocchiFondazione Chiossone, Genova, Italy.
Margherita BoninoScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Lecco 23849, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Francesca TinelliDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa 56128, Italy.
Paola CamicioneIRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova 16147, Italy.
Massimiliano SerafinoIRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova 16147, Italy.
Monica GoriUnit for Visually Impaired People (U-VIP), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa 16152, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing the temporal relationship between stimuli challenges the brain, requiring some tolerance for asynchronies to form coherent representations. Based on the theory of implicit causal inference, we hypothesized that temporal processing of events is influenced by spatial features as stimuli coming from the same spatial location are most likely to derive from a common source and, consequently, implicitly merged in time. As visual experience guides the formation of neural sensory maps, we expected the spatial influence on temporal processing to depend on visual experience. In Experiment 1, 41 sighted children and adults (22 females) judged the temporal order of auditory and tactile stimuli delivered to the same or different hands (somatotopic manipulation), with hands either close or far apart (spatiotopic manipulation). In Experiment 2, sighted individuals (15 females) were compared with 26 early blind children and adults (12 females) during the somatotopic manipulation with hands far apart. Results revealed an improvement of temporal resolution with age in sighted individuals, while blind children performed similarly to adults. Notably, spatial features affected the temporal processing of sighted but not blind people, regardless of age. Sighted participants showed higher temporal tolerance toward asynchronies in the case of somatotopic or spatiotopic congruence. A bioinspired neurocomputational model has been developed to unveil neural mechanisms underlying the interaction between spatial and temporal processing. The model demonstrates that temporal processing is mediated by a spatially organized synaptic architecture, which requires visual experience to develop. Without vision, spatial alignment may not be conceptualized as a prior influencing temporal processing.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionTime PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultBlindnessChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationYoung Adultauditory–tactileblindnessneural modelingspatial perceptiontemporal perception

Identifiers

PMID41062282
PMCPMC12782747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.