ArticleBMJ open2025
Identifying physicians' views on compassionate care in daily clinical practice: a multicentre Q-methodology study in Belgium.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCompassionate care transcends the mere clinical treatment of illness to encompass the psychological and social dimensions of patient well-being. It is often unclear how physicians from different specialities perceive this complex process. This study aimed at identifying their different views on compassionate care in daily clinical practice.
designA Q-methodology study was conducted. This mixed-method methodology combines quantitative and qualitative analysis to identify participants' subjective viewpoints. Participants ranked 53 statements on the dimensions of compassionate care according to their point of view, followed by an interview. Principal component analysis, followed by varimax and additional manual rotation, was used to identify groups that shared similar views.
settingTwo hospitals, one facility for people with disabilities and three private practices in Belgium.
participants29 physicians from different specialties with clinical practice were purposively sampled.
resultsThree views on compassionate care in daily practice were identified. The task-oriented view attached the most importance to making the best use of clinical knowledge and expertise and acting in the best interest of the patient, accompanied by clear and appropriate communication of medical information. The system-oriented view emphasised an authentic and non-judgemental attitude, as well as a relationship of trust, self-reflection, clinician's well-being and a compassionate working environment. Lastly, in the relationship-oriented view, the focus was on building a relationship of respect and trust with the patient by active listening and getting to know the patient, and engaging him in the care process. The physicians' viewpoints varied by specialty and setting.
conclusionsThe findings of our study and the approach taken contribute to further clarifying the differences in physicians' views on compassionate care in daily clinical practice. Physicians loading on the task-oriented view worked mostly in highly technical or acute care environments. In the system-oriented view, they were active in paediatrics and primary, palliative and mental healthcare. And in the relationship-oriented view, physicians often worked with oncology patients or patients with chronic diseases. These findings may have an impact on a better understanding of compassionate care in different clinical settings, facilitate the design of compassion training and ultimately improve patient care and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.