ArticleBMJ open2025
Sepsis-related myocardial injury: the role of bacterial pathogens and toxins-a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis-related myocardial injury is common in sepsis patients and has been repeatedly associated with poor patient outcomes. While experimental animal studies suggest that direct and indirect myocardial damage occurs via a wide range of inflammatory mediators, including bacterial toxins, the extent of bacterial-driven myocardial injury in human sepsis remains unclear. This scoping review aims to map existing evidence, identify knowledge gaps and guide future research priorities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The review is anticipated to start on 12 December 2024 and be completed by 31 October 2025. A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science and EMBASE. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review of potentially eligible studies. Studies focusing on the role of bacteria and/or their toxins in myocardial injury in adult patients with sepsis will be included. Data will be independently extracted using predefined forms, and findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. On completion, findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and presented at scientific conferences. The results will help identify and analyse knowledge gaps, providing valuable insights to inform future research in patients with sepsis. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Registered on Open Science Framework 3 March 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.