ArticleBMJ open2025
Self-advocacy in stroke patients in China: a mixed-methods analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSelf-advocacy is associated with positive health outcomes, which is a central issue in chronic disease management. This study attempted to define self-advocacy operationally and conduct a mixed-methods analysis of self-advocacy among stroke patients in China.
designSchwartz-Barcott and Kim's method was used to clarify the concept of self-advocacy.
settingTwo hospitals in Zhengzhou and Luoyang City, Henan Province, China.
participantsA total of 12 stroke patients were recruited and interviewed face to face from October 2023 to December 2023. OUTCOMES: A three-phase method (theoretical phase, fieldwork phase and final analysis phase) was employed to conduct the mixed concept analysis. In the theoretical phase, a literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase, PsycINFO, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database and CBMdisc. 38 articles in databases were evaluated without time limits up to August 2023. In the fieldwork phase, semistructured interviews were used to interview the 12 participants who were chosen using purposive sampling. In the final analysis phase, the results from both the initial and second phases were integrated.
resultsThe review of literature in the theoretical phase determined the attributes of the concept, including 'self-cognition', 'self-decision making', 'effective communication', 'social connection'. In the field study phase, attributes such as 'self-awareness', 'self-care knowledge and abilities' and 'seeking support' were added. In the final analysis phase, self-advocacy was finally defined as five attributes: 'self-awareness', 'self-care level', 'self-decision-making', 'effective communication' and 'seeking support'.
conclusionsSelf-advocacy was defined as the capacity of stroke patients to comprehend and articulate their personal needs and care preferences, make proactive and meaningful decisions, engage in effective communication with healthcare providers and derive strength by seeking support from others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.