Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062112›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Outcome of multiagency investigation for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in prepubertal children: a retrospective review.

Rebecca Corry, Scott Beard, Faiza Thompson, Patrick Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca CorryTe Puaruruhau (Child Protection Team), Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Scott BeardAuckland City District, New Zealand Police, Auckland, New Zealand.
Faiza ThompsonAuckland, Oranga Tamariki Ministry for Children, Auckland, New Zealand.
Patrick KellyTe Puaruruhau (Child Protection Team), Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand patrickk@adhb.govt.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-8877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the process and outcomes of multiagency investigation of gonorrhoea and chlamydia in prepubertal children.

designRetrospective review of cases presenting to a hospital multidisciplinary child protection team (CPT).

settingA multiagency centre adjacent to Starship Children's Hospital, in the city of Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand. The hospital CPT is colocated in this centre with statutory child protection services (CPS), police and forensic interviewers.

participantsAll prepubertal children seen with gonorrhoea or chlamydia from 2009 to 2020.

resultsThere were 16 children aged 1 to 9 years: 10 with

conclusionsPrompt, thorough and coordinated multiagency investigation of prepubertal NG and CT infection (including household screening and expert interviewing of children) will often identify the source of infection and almost always establish sexual transmission. However, even in a tertiary centre, cases are rare, leading to variability in practice. Conjunctivitis caused by NG or CT has a high risk of being sexually transmitted, so should be investigated with the same rigour as anogenital infection. Findings in this cohort, where penetrative sexual offences were confirmed by criminal convictions, support the international consensus that penetrative sexual abuse of children seldom causes anogenital injury.

Indexed as

Child Abuse, SexualChlamydia InfectionsGonorrheaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNew ZealandRetrospective StudiesChild AbuseEpidemiologyForensic Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41062112
PMCPMC12506203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.