Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062031›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026

Suicide Risk Management in Ecological Momentary Assessment: Participant Concealment of Suicidal Thoughts and Experiences with Safety Procedures.

Anne C Knorr, Brooke A Ammerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne C KnorrUniversity of Notre Dame, Department of Psychology, Notre Dame, IN, USA. Electronic address: aknorr@nd.edu.
Brooke A AmmermanUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Psychology, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: baammerman@wisc.edu.

Funding

Stress experiences as markers of person-level vulnerability and temporal risk for near-term suicidal ideationF31MH135693 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI KNORR, ANNE · 2023 to 2025
$145k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH135693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has advanced the study of real-time suicide risk; however, the ethical obligations of researchers in responding to potential participant safety concerns are a topic of continued discussion. Initial research found that participants may modify their EMA ratings to avoid researcher contact, but the rates of underreporting or concealing of suicidal ideation (SI) are unknown, as are motivations for and correlates of these thoughts and behaviors. Beyond impacting participant reports, suicide risk assessment in response to elevated participant risk may also introduce intervention effects into EMA studies. This line of research is imperative to understanding barriers to ecologically valid data while also protecting participants. This study sought to fill these research gaps among a sample of community participants reporting past 6-month SI (N = 94; M

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentRisk ManagementSuicidal IdeationSuicideAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentYoung AdultEMAExperience samplingParticipant safetyResearch ethicsRisk protocolsSuicidal ideationUnderreport

Identifiers

PMID41062031
PMCPMC12530944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.