ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Suicide Risk Management in Ecological Momentary Assessment: Participant Concealment of Suicidal Thoughts and Experiences with Safety Procedures.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotion Differentiation and Dynamics Predicting Suicide Outcomes in High-Risk Adults.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026Article
- Comparing Objective Measures of Sleep Disturbance and Sleep Related Impairments as Proximal Risk Indicators of Suicidal Intent and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has advanced the study of real-time suicide risk; however, the ethical obligations of researchers in responding to potential participant safety concerns are a topic of continued discussion. Initial research found that participants may modify their EMA ratings to avoid researcher contact, but the rates of underreporting or concealing of suicidal ideation (SI) are unknown, as are motivations for and correlates of these thoughts and behaviors. Beyond impacting participant reports, suicide risk assessment in response to elevated participant risk may also introduce intervention effects into EMA studies. This line of research is imperative to understanding barriers to ecologically valid data while also protecting participants. This study sought to fill these research gaps among a sample of community participants reporting past 6-month SI (N = 94; M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.