ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Potential predictors of future suicide attempts in adolescents assigned female at birth.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSuicide is a leading cause of death among adolescents, with complex neurobiological origins. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for future suicide attempts in adolescents assigned female at birth (AFAB) with varying histories of lifetime non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), utilizing multi-unit data across three relevant Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) domains.
methodParticipants (N = 164; ages 12-16) were enrolled in a 3-year longitudinal study with annual assessments. Of these, 121 completed at least one follow-up, during which 21 reported a suicide attempt. Binomial Elastic-Net regression was used to identify baseline RDoC, clinical, and demographic predictors applying 100 iterations of 80/20 training-test splits and optimizing the penalty term via 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsRDoC predictors of future suicide attempts included (1) Threat: higher amygdala-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) resting-state functional connectivity, lower amygdala activation and poorer accuracy of emotion matching in threat task; (2) Cognitive control: greater putamen activation during negative inhibition, lower dorsal frontal cortex activation during positive inhibition, slower reactions to negative no-inhibition, thinner mPFC; (3) Self-knowledge: lower anterior Self Network activation to negative stimuli, thinner posterior Self Network, and faster reactions to positive stimuli. Clinical and demographic predictors included higher depression and NSSI severity, psychotropic medication use, histories of neglect and abuse, and identifying as gender-minority.
conclusionWhile supporting past research implicating well-known clinical and demographic factors, current findings suggest novel neurobiological markers of suicide risk in adolescents, which could represent targets for interventions to prevent suicide attempts in adolescents, if confirmed in future research with larger samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.