Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41061927›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies STK11 as a critical regulator of sialic acid clusters important for influenza A virus attachment.

Huimin Sun, Jiahui Zou, Shaoyu Tu, Didan Luo, Rong Xiao, Yue Du, Chuhan Xiong, Shengsong Xie, Hailong Liu, Meilin Jin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huimin SunNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Jiahui ZouNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Shaoyu TuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Didan LuoNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Rong XiaoNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Yue DuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Chuhan XiongNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Shengsong XieNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Hailong LiuFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Meilin JinNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine in Hubei Province, The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Huanchun ChenNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine in Hubei Province, The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.
Hongbo ZhouNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine in Hubei Province, The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China. Electronic address: hbzhou@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSwine influenza virus (SIV) is a highly contagious respiratory pathogen in pigs that causes substantial economic losses in the pig industry. Importantly, pigs act as "mixing vessels" for diverse influenza A viruses (IAVs), facilitating the emergence of novel pandemic strains through reassortment, which represents a continuous global public health threat. IAV replication relies heavily on host cellular machinery, underscoring the importance of elucidating virus-host protein interactions for the development of targeted antiviral therapeutics.

objectivesThis study aims to identify host genes required for SIV replication via a genome-wide CRISPR screen and elucidate the mechanism by which STK11 modulates viral replication.

methodsA pig genome-scale CRISPR knockout (PigGeCKO) screen was performed in newborn pig trachea (NPTr) cells to identify host genes required for SIV replication. Candidate genes were further validated by generating knockout cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, followed by assessing their impact on IAV replication. The specific lifecycle stage regulated by STK11 and its mechanistic role in viral attachment were determined via Western blotting, confocal microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging. In vivo validation of STK11 knockdown effects on IAV replication was conducted in BALB/c mice treated with STK11-targeting siRNA, with outcomes evaluated by survival analysis, body weight monitoring, lung viral titers quantification, immunofluorescence, and histopathology.

resultsSTK11 promotes replication of different IAV subtypes in vitro, and STK11 knockdown significantly suppresses SIV replication in vivo. Mechanistically, STK11 depletion impairs viral attachment by altering the organization of sialic acid clusters, mediated through reduced intracellular actin stress fibers via inhibition of RhoA signaling pathway.

conclusionWe identify STK11 as a novel regulator of IAV attachment and elucidate its mechanistic role in facilitating viral entry. These findings highlight the potential of STK11 to serve as an ideal antiviral target against IAV infection.

Indexed as

Influenza A virusN-Acetylneuraminic AcidOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesVirus AttachmentAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDogsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMiceSwineVirus ReplicationAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesN-Acetylneuraminic AcidProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAttachmentCRISPR screenSialic acid clusterSTK11Swine influenza virus

Identifiers

PMID41061927
PMCPMC13316352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.