ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2025
Sexual orientation identity and attraction changes among youth: prospective versus retrospective measurement.
Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePrior work has documented sexual orientation change, or fluidity, among youth over time. Some studies measure change via retrospective recall while others assess change prospectively. It is unclear whether retrospective recall and prospective assessment measure change experiences similarly. The current study examines whether prospectively assessed change in sexual orientation identity (SOI) and attractions aligns with change as assessed via retrospective recall of change.
methodsUS youth (N = 1235), aged 14-25 years, participated in a longitudinal online cohort. Prospective change in SOI and attraction were determined by comparing self-reported SOI and attraction at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Retrospective recall of SOI and attraction change was assessed at 4-month follow-up. The sensitivity and specificity of retrospective recall of change was assessed in relation to change detected prospectively.
resultsProspectively, 12.8 % of youth changed their reported SOI between baseline and follow-up. Retrospectively, only 5.0 % recalled change for the same period. Prospectively, 21.9 % reported attraction changes between baseline and follow-up. Retrospectively, only 12.4 % recalled attraction changes. Only 17.3 % (95 % CI 11.3, 23.4) who prospectively reported SOI change and 28.7 % (95 % CI 23.3, 34.2) who prospectively reported attraction change also reported change retrospectively.
conclusionsThe prevalence of change in SOI and attractions varied substantially by whether change was assessed prospectively or retrospectively. Researchers and clinicians should consider how the method and timing of assessment may influence their ability to detect changes in SOI and attractions within youth populations. Identification of youth experiencing change is critical for allocation of relevant resources and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.