Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41061761›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2026

The diagnosis and management of extrauterine and uterine ectopic pregnancy.

Jessica Farren, Bassel H Al Wattar, Davor Jurkovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The paradox of early pregnancy care: Overtreatment amid systemic neglect.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica FarrenWomen's Health Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-6499
Bassel H Al WattarClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8287-9271
Davor JurkovicWomen's Health Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6487-5736

Funding

Anglia Ruskin UniversityUniversity College London
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, we have consolidated our knowledge of the epidemiology and risk factors for ectopic pregnancies. Minimally invasive surgical skills are now widespread, and laparoscopic surgery is recognized as the best and safest operative treatment for extrauterine ectopic pregnancies. Based on the evidence from randomized trials published a decade ago, laparoscopic salpingectomy is accepted as the optimal surgical treatment for tubal ectopic pregnancy. However, with recent advances in surgical techniques and improvement in surgical skills, the appropriateness of tubal removal versus conservation is under increasing scrutiny. Improvements in the organization and provision of care for women presenting with early pregnancy complications, in conjunction with better quality and wider use of ultrasound imaging, have resulted in an increased ability to detect small failing ectopic pregnancies, which were impossible to diagnose in the past. Many of these pregnancies are destined to resolve spontaneously without the need for any intervention. The necessity to avoid overtreatment and the potential for iatrogenic harm in such cases has facilitated the introduction of expectant management into mainstream clinical practice. This represents one of the key developments in the care for women with ectopic pregnancies. By contrast, the efficacy of medical management with methotrexate has been questioned. Another important development in recent years has been a rapid rise in the prevalence of ectopic pregnancies that are located outside the uterine cavity but within the confines of the uterus, the largest burden of which is from Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. This has promoted the development of new terminology and classification of ectopic pregnancies, with the aim of raising awareness of these increasingly prevalent types and minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis. In comparison to ectopic pregnancies outside the uterus, uterine ectopic pregnancies are more difficult to diagnose and manage, and are also associated with increased maternal morbidity, mortality, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Another challenge, which is peculiar to uterine ectopic pregnancies, is their potential to progress to reach foetal viability, albeit with a high risk of extreme prematurity. This requires women and clinicians to make difficult decisions about whether these pregnancies should be terminated to protect maternal health, despite some possibility of a good foetal outcome. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of published literature to summarize new evidence and explore emerging themes with respect to ectopic pregnancy. Our aim is to provide an overview of modern classification and diagnosis, to summarize available treatment options and recommendations, and to emphasize longer-term outcomes, including the potential psychological impact of ectopic pregnancy. We examine current knowledge gaps and outline priorities for further research.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, EctopicFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMethotrexatePregnancyRisk FactorsSalpingectomyMethotrexateabdominal ectopic pregnancyCaesarean scar ectopic pregnancyectopic pregnancyextrauterine ectopic pregnancyinterstitial ectopic pregnancyovarian ectopic pregnancypsychologysurgeryultrasounduterine ectopic pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41061761
PMCPMC12922837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.