Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41061751›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2026

The Association between Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Density and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Tetsuya Kawakita, Rula Atwani, Misa Hayasaka, Lindsay Robbins, George Saade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tetsuya KawakitaEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2438-1699
Rula AtwaniEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, United States.
Misa HayasakaEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, United States.
Lindsay RobbinsEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, United States.
George SaadeEVMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, United States.

Funding

Eastern Virginia Medical School VHS 241231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We sought to examine the association between maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physician density and adverse pregnancy outcomes at the state level. Study Design: This was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available, state-level data from 2018 to 2021, including Natality, Multiple Cause-of-Death, and Fetal Death databases. The number of active MFM physicians per year was obtained for each state from the American Medical Association Masterfile. The primary exposure was the density of MFM per state, categorized into three groups: (1) low density (<30 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births), (2) moderate density (30-59 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births), and (3) high density (≥60 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births). Our primary outcome was maternal mortality during pregnancy and up to 42 days postdelivery. Our secondary outcomes were pregnancy-related mortality up to 365 days postdelivery and stillbirth. We calculated adjusted incident rate ratios (aIRR) and average marginal effect (AME) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using multivariable negative binomial mixed effects regression models. Results: Overall, there were 14,792,743 live births, 3,440 maternal mortalities, 4,980 pregnancy-related mortalities, and 90,848 stillbirths included. The median MFM density across states was 31.6 per 100,000 live births (interquartile range: 21.9-42.5). States with high MFM density had a reduced risk of maternal mortality (aIRR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85) and pregnancy-related mortality (aIRR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) compared with states with low MFM density, corresponding to 7.29 (AME: 95% CI: 3.58-11.00) and 5.57 (AME: 95% CI: 0.74-10.40) less mortality per 100,000 live births, respectively. States with moderate MFM density had a similar risk of maternal mortality compared with low MFM density states (aIRR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.87-1.20). Conclusion: High MFM-density states have a decreased risk of maternal mortality compared with low MFM-density states, suggesting a critical role of MFM in reducing maternal mortality. Key Points: · An association between MFM physician density and maternal mortality is unclear.. · States with higher MFM density had a lower risk of maternal mortality than those with fewer.. · This study highlights the importance of increasing MFM access in underserved areas to potentially reduce maternal mortality..

Indexed as

Maternal MortalityObstetricsPhysiciansPregnancy OutcomeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyStillbirthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41061751
PMCPMC13286091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.