Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41061669›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

On ARGs, pedigrees, and genetic relatedness matrices.

Brieuc Lehmann, Hanbin Lee, Luke Anderson-Trocmé, Jerome Kelleher, Gregor Gorjanc, Peter L Ralph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational epidemiological studies can mitigate genetic confounding with a genetic relatedness matrix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Parameterizing the genetic architecture under stabilizing selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Pandemic-Scale Ancestral Recombination Graph for SARS-CoV-2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brieuc LehmannDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7302-4391
Hanbin LeeDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-0027
Luke Anderson-TrocméDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Jerome KelleherBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Gregor GorjancThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-2787
Peter L RalphInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97402, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-6866

Funding

Scaling up computational genomics with tree sequencesR01HG012473 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PETER Lochhead RALPH · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
BBSRC BBS/E/D/30002275, BBS/E/RL/230001A, and BBS/E/RL/230001CBBSRC BB/T014067/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)EPSRC EP/R018561/1EPSRC EP/X024881/1National Institutes of Health NHGRINHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012473NRC 346741NSERC PDF-588001-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic relatedness is a central concept in genetics, underpinning studies of population and quantitative genetics in human, animal, and plant settings. It is typically stored as a genetic relatedness matrix, whose elements are pairwise relatedness values between individuals. This relatedness has been defined in various contexts based on pedigree, genotype, phylogeny, coalescent times, and, recently, ancestral recombination graph. For some downstream applications, including association studies, using ancestral recombination graph-based genetic relatedness matrices has led to better performance relative to the genotype genetic relatedness matrix. However, they present computational challenges due to their inherent quadratic time and space complexity. Here, we first discuss the different definitions of relatedness in a unifying context, making use of the additive model of a quantitative trait to provide a definition of "branch relatedness" and the corresponding "branch genetic relatedness matrix". We explore the relationship between branch relatedness and pedigree relatedness (i.e. kinship) through a case study of French-Canadian individuals that have a known pedigree. Through the tree sequence encoding of an ancestral recombination graph, we then derive an efficient algorithm for computing products between the branch genetic relatedness matrix and a general vector, without explicitly forming the branch genetic relatedness matrix. This algorithm leverages the sparse encoding of genomes with the tree sequence and hence enables large-scale computations with the branch genetic relatedness matrix. We demonstrate the power of this algorithm by developing a randomized principal components algorithm for tree sequences that easily scales to millions of genomes. All algorithms are implemented in the open source tskit Python package. Taken together, this work consolidates the different notions of relatedness as branch relatedness and, by leveraging the tree sequence encoding of an ancestral recombination graph, provides efficient algorithms that enable computations with the branch genetic relatedness matrix that scale to mega-scale genomic datasets.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPedigreeAlgorithmsGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansPhylogenyRecombination, Geneticancestral recombination graphgenetic relatednesspedigree relatednessprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID41061669
PMCPMC12774834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.