ArticleSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2025
Study design and protocol of a randomized, pragmatic, comparative effectiveness trial evaluating a sequenced strategy for improving outcomes in people with knee osteoarthritis pain (SKOAP): Conservative treatment evaluation.
Article in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and provider radiation exposure during fluoroscopy guided chemical and thermal neurolysis of genicular nerves: A prospective cohort comparison study.Interventional pain medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatment guidelines for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) vary across organizations, partly due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Experts disagree on the role of psychological management, pharmacologic treatments including opioids, and interventional therapies. METHODS/
designThe Sequenced strategy for Knee OsteoArthritis Pain (SKOAP) trial is a multi-site, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial that uses a two-phase sequential design to evaluate the effectiveness of several interventions in individuals reporting KOA pain. Described here is the protocol for Phase 1 of the trial sequence which focuses on conservative treatments. All participants receive Best Practices (BP), a guideline-based approach to care that includes physical therapies, alternative treatments, and over-the-counter medications. Participants are then randomized to one of three groups: (1) BP alone, (2) BP plus duloxetine (30-120 mg/day), or (3) BP plus duloxetine and painTRAINER, a web-based, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-informed pain coping skills training. Phase 1 aims to determine whether the combination of duloxetine and BP improves pain compared to BP alone, and whether the combination of painTRAINER, duloxetine and BP provides additional benefit compared to duloxetine combined with BP. The analysis will include a modified Intention to Treat (mITT) approach and two Per-Protocol (PP) analyses; Receipt of Prescription (PP-ROP) and Minimum Effective Dose (PP-MinED). A third aim of Phase 1 is to identify clinical characteristics, patient-level factors, and psychosocial phenotypes that predict short- and long-term outcomes. DISCUSSION: Findings from Phase 1 of the SKOAP trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacologic and psychological interventions for the treatment of painful KOA beyond established best practices. It may also help refine personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.