Trial reportPediatric neurology2025
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes From the PREVeNT Trial.
Trial report in Pediatric neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is associated with high prevalence of epilepsy, intellectual and developmental disability, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). PREVeNT, a Phase IIb, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the efficacy of vigabatrin in preventing intellectual and developmental disability and ASD in infants with TSC. Phenotypic, developmental, and ASD-specific outcomes at 36 months are presented.
methodsEighty-four infants with TSC were enrolled in PREVeNT across 13 TSC clinics in the United States. Participants underwent neurodevelopmental assessments at ages 6 months through 36 months. Clinical best estimate diagnosis of ASD or non-ASD along with a rating of clinical certainty was determined at 36 months.
resultsSixty-five participants completed assessments through 36 months of age. Mean cognitive scores on the Bayley-III were in the low average range at 12 months. Cognitive scores declined slightly in all groups over time. Adaptive scores were in the low average range for the seizure groups. For all neurocognitive measures, those in the watchful waiting group exhibited higher scores compared to the other cohorts. Language scores became more commensurate with cognitive scores by 36 months. The Clinical Certainty Rating was available for 58 patients, with 31% rated as having ASD; this did not differ by treatment assignment.
conclusionsNo significant differences in developmental or autism-specific outcomes were seen between treatment groups, and no participants without epilepsy were diagnosed with ASD. This may be due to early detection of seizures, closer developmental monitoring and follow-up in the trial, and impacts of the pandemic on study participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.