ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
Bilingual Perception of Dysarthric Speech.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite the prevalence of bilingualism, research on the understanding of disordered speech has focused almost exclusively on monolingual populations. Hypothesis-driven studies with dysarthric speech have revealed that greater vocabulary knowledge and working memory support understanding in monolingual listeners. However, whether these explanatory models generalize to bilinguals, who differ in both cognitive and linguistic profiles, is unknown. This study examined whether bilingualism affords a perceptual advantage in understanding dysarthric speech, and whether working memory and vocabulary knowledge contribute to that advantage.
methodNinety-four listeners, categorized as monolinguals, early bilinguals, or late bilinguals, completed a speech perception task where they transcribed phrases produced by speakers with dysarthria. They also completed working memory and vocabulary assessments.
resultsRelative to monolingual and late bilinguals, early bilinguals had equivalent working memory scores, lower vocabulary scores, and reduced intelligibility scores when perceiving dysarthric speech. Vocabulary knowledge, but not working memory, predicted intelligibility scores across all groups. A post hoc correlation analysis within the early bilingual group further revealed that an earlier age of exposure to English was associated with higher intelligibility scores, suggesting that age of language exposure plays a critical role in shaping the linguistic systems that support perception of disordered speech.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of vocabulary knowledge and language experience, over working memory, in facilitating understanding of disordered speech. They also highlight the need to refine models of disordered speech perception to account for variability across listener populations, in order to more fully capture the relative contributions of cognitive and linguistic mechanisms. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30220360.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.