ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025
Sustainability of Digital Home Care and Health Care Services in 2 Case Studies in Finland: Combined Climate and Social Impact Assessment.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainability in Telehomecare: Exploring Practical Nurses' Perceptions, Engagement, and Leadership Implications.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digitalization is seen as a way to reduce the negative environmental impacts of health care production, but research is still limited. Objective: This study focuses on the assessment of the sustainability aspects of digital services in home care and health care. It demonstrates the approach to identify the climate impacts and social impacts-both positive and negative-on a selection of digital home care and health care services, such as medicine robot services for older home care clients, through 2 Finnish case studies. Methods: Impacts are identified from interviews and statistical data collected from public service providers and technology suppliers using both quantitative and qualitative assessments. Results: While a well-planned and well-implemented digital service is likely to be a climate-friendly option, every digitalization action carries at least some negative impacts. The design, architecture, and practical implementation of these services greatly affect their climate and social impacts. Conclusions: This study uses a novel combination of impact assessment methods, highlighting the importance of qualitative understanding alongside quantitative approaches for interpreting results, especially when numerical data are limited. Advocating for multimethod impact assessments is crucial to properly capturing the service context and promoting holistic sustainability thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.