ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Optimization of Lennard-Jones Parameters for Induced Dipole Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The van der Waals potential is an integral component in molecular mechanics force fields. In this work, we document our effort to develop the parameters for the Lennard-Jones (LJ) 12-6 potential as part of our effort to develop a polarizable Gaussian multipole force field. Starting from the GAFF2 van der Waals parameter set, atom types were assigned using the Antechamber program in the AMBER24 simulation package. Atomic charges and permanent dipoles were calculated via PCMRESP, based on electrostatic potentials computed at the MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level in four solvents with dielectric constants ranging from 4.24 to 78.36. The optimization of the LJ parameters was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, we employed CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies of about 4.6 million dimer conformations, including those from Shaw and co-workers, and applied an iterative least-squares fitting procedure. This reduced the Boltzmann factor-weighted root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 2.44 to 0.97 kcal/mol. When tested on 161 neat liquids, the simulated densities yielded an average unsigned percent error of 5.3% from the experimental values. In the second stage, the parameters were further refined by comparing simulated and experimental densities of the same 161-liquid training set using a gradient-guided iterative search based on short molecular dynamics simulations. After 24 iterations, the average unsigned percent error was reduced to 1.71%. Extended 10 ns simulations yielded an average unsigned percent error of 1.69% for the training set densities, which compares favorably with the 2.45% error obtained from GAFF2. The RMSE for heats of vaporization (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.